An interesting documentary about the - Unlawful Killing - from princess Diana Spencer by the British royal family and surrounding elite, according to this document. Besides containing interesting data about Diana's death, the broader picture that is sketched about how the different institutions help and shield the elite is especially interesting. In fact, they are so effective that this documentary is not allowed to be broadcast in the UK to this day. And is also extremely censored on the internet.
In this document it becomes painfully clear how the top of the police and the press fully engage with the interests of this elite and then later receive a beautiful title or ribbon by the British Her Majesty.
The British people and people worldwide, for example, despite an official jury verdict of Unlawful Killing, were hard-pressed by the media that it was an accident caused by a drunk driver chased by the paparazzi. Top people at the police and judicial authorities also pass by who withheld important information that was never prosecuted for this and later elevated to lord.
Did we mention that the British Royal family, the Windsors are also named as 1 of 8 to 10 families worldwide who would form the private banking cartel with major interests in the drug, oil and weapons industries? At least according to Dean Henderson. In short, a very interesting documentary about the mechanisms of power in and behind the British kingdom. Kind of a real life version of Game of Thrones, shall we say.
Keith Allen's film exposes the in-plain-sight cover up of what happened to Diana in Paris in 1997 and her cold, heartless and disgusting treatment by this cold, heartless and disgusting family - including the way that the judge at the excuse-for- an-inquest ordered royal correspondence with Diana from people like Prince Philip to be censored before being made public. Does this remind anyone of how the judge at the excuse-for-an-inquiry into North Wales child abuse ordered that famous political names could not be mentioned by the victims?
Meanwhile found an online version again, so the following is (temporarily) no longer valid. Watch the documentary now before it is brought back online.
(Always annoying to see that the documentary you link to is being taken off the internet, although it might be a nice demonstration of how much certain forces apparently want you not to see this documentary. Here you can see the battle between the internet and the people who don't want you to see this documentary.) Op www.facebook.com/UnlawfulKillingFilm you can find the facebook group of Unlawful Killing.
(If anyone can find a good link, online version or a working torrent of Unlawful Killing here, please put it in the comments.)
The film exposes the pathetic irrelevance of the mainstream media which is just an arm of the same Establishment which it is alleged to be 'reporting' - with a few honorary exceptions scattered here and there. This is the BBC's 'royal correspondent', Nicholas Witchell, one of the most pompous people I have ever met, depicted in the film fast asleep more than once while inquest evidence was being heard.
Unlawful Killing is the incredibly important and highly revealing 'inquest of the inquest' that reveals overwhelming evidence of a massive Establishment cover up in the UK and France and this is why it has not been seen in the UK but can be watched now on an overseas website.
Keith Allen said around the time of the royal wedding in 2011, when Diana's son, William, married Kate Middleton:
Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Republicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote. '
Mohamed Al Fayed is no angelic being of sweetness and light either, but the point of this film is to show how what happened to Diana was systematically covered up by the alleged inquest into the death of her and Dodi Fayed. From this comes a simple question: why would there be a cover up if there was not something highly significant to cover up?
A clinical psychologist describes Prince Philip in the film as a man devoid of guilt, empathy and love - precisely the character traits of the royal and 'elite' bloodlines worldwide that I have been exposing for nearly a quarter of a century. The royal family as a whole are described as 'gangsters in tiaras'. Even this is mild compared with their sick and sordid past and present
How would it actually be with our royal family and how the Netherlands works? Could there be any parallels between the British and Dutch royals? Or should we perhaps not want to know ...
Related articles and information:
-) Plots are inherent to power structures
-) The royal family what does that actually cost?
-) Who are the international private banking cartel?
-) The United States' War on Democracy
-) Confessions of an economic hitman
-) The military industrial complex
-) 100 years of mind control experiments
-) Corruption explained by ex-lobbyist
-) The History of Oil
-) How fair is our current economic system really?
-) Does the Netherlands lack independent news media?
-) Is the Dutch constitutional state corrupt and blackmailable?
-) Open letter to the NOS about human trafficking and child abuse