2000 jaar strijd om het geldsysteem

In het begin was ik in de veronderstelling dat de huidige problemen die we hebben met de economie nieuw zijn. Echter hoe verder je je erin verdiept hoe meer patronen zichtbaar worden en dan blijkt dat er weinig tot niets nieuws aan is. Dit overzicht van 2000 jaar over het geldsysteem en vooral de strijd daarover tussen overheden en private bankiers is zeer verhelderend. Het meest complete overzicht wat ik tot nu toe ben tegengekomen. Wie het allemaal leest weet aan het einde waarschijnlijk meer over economie, politiek en geschiedenis dan de gemiddelde economoon in Nederland. Het geheel is te vinden op The History of the “Money Changers”. Hieronder een aantal fragmenten en leuke weetjes.

Economists continually try and sell the public the idea that recessions or depressions are a natural part of what they call the “business cycle”.

This timeline below will prove that is simply not the case. Recessions and depressions only occur because the Central Bankers manipulate the money supply, to ensure more and more is in their hands and less and less is in the hands of the people.

Central Bankers developed out of money changers and it is with these people we pick the story up in 48 B.C. below

Dan een aantal interessante feitjes met betrekking tot Nederland.

1609 The money changers in the Netherlands establish the first central bank in history, in Amsterdam.

1688 The money changers in England following a series of squabbles with the Stuart Kings, Charles II (1660 – 1685) and James II (1685 – 1688), conspire with their far more successful money changing counterparts in the Netherlands, who had already set up a central bank there.
They decide to finance an invasion by William of Orange who they sound out and establish will be more favorable to them. The invasion is successful and William of Orange ascends to the throne in England as King William III in 1689.

King William III of England ook wel William of Orange geeft de centrale bank in handen van private bankiers

1694 Following a costly series of wars over the last 50 years, English Government officials go, cap in hand, to the money changers for loans necessary to pursue their political purposes. The money changers agree to solve this problem in exchange for a government sanctioned privately owned bank which could issue money created out of nothing.

This was deceptively named the, “Bank of England,” for the sole purpose of duping the general public into believing it was part of the government, which it was not.

Like any other private corporation the Bank of England sold shares to get started. The private investors, whose names were never revealed, were supposed to put up £1,250,000 in gold coins to buy their shares in the bank, but only £750,000 was ever received. Despite that the bank was duly chartered and began loaning out several times the money it supposedly had in reserves, all at interest.

William Paterson
Although the Bank of England’s private investors were never revealed, one of the Directors, William Paterson, stated,
The Bank hath benefit of interest on all monies which it creates out of nothing.”

Furthermore the Bank of England would loan government officials as much of the new currency as they wanted, as long as they secured the debt by direct taxation of the British people. The Bank of England amounted to nothing less than the legal counterfeiting of a national currency for private gain, and thus any country that would fall under the control of a private bank would amount to nothing more than a plutocracy.

En tot slot een korte beschrijving van wat voor 4 stappenplan internationale bankiers tegenwoordig gebruiken om landjes te strippen en de bevolking vervolgens te knechten. Het lijkt mij pijnlijk duidelijk dat Nederland hier al heel erg diep in zit mede door hun verbond en hun afspraken om te voldoen aan de eisen van Europa:

2001 Professor Joseph Stiglitz, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, and former Chairman of President Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, goes public over the World Bank’s, “Four Step Strategy,” which is designed to enslave nations to the bankers. I summarize this below,

Joseph Stiglitz

Step One: Privatization.
This is actually where national leaders are offered 10% commissions to their secret Swiss bank accounts in exchange for them trimming a few billion dollars off the sale price of national assets. Bribery and corruption, pure and simple.

Step Two: Capital Market Liberalization.
This is the repealing of any laws that tax money going over its borders. Stiglitz calls this the, “hot money,” cycle. Initially cash comes in from abroad to speculate in real estate and currency, then when the economy in that country starts to look promising, this outside wealth is pulled straight out again, causing the economy to collapse.

The nation then requires IMF help and the IMF provides it under the pretext that they raise interest rates anywhere from 30% to 80%. This happened in Indonesia and Brazil, also in other Asian and Latin American nations. These higher interest rates consequently impoverish a country, demolishing property values, savaging industrial production and draining national treasuries.

Step Three: Market Based Pricing.
This is where the prices of food, water and domestic gas are raised which predictably leads to social unrest in the respective nation, now more commonly referred to as, “IMF Riots.” These riots cause the flight of capital and government bankruptcies. This benefits the foreign corporations as the nations remaining assets can be purchased at rock bottom prices.

Step Four: Free Trade.
This is where international corporations burst into Asia, Latin America and Africa, whilst at the same time Europe and America barricade their own markets against third world agriculture. They also impose extortionate tariffs which these countries have to pay for branded pharmaceuticals, causing soaring rates in death and disease

There are a lot of losers in this system, but a few winners – bankers. In fact the IMF and World Bank have made the sale of electricity, water, telephone and gas systems a condition of loans to every developing nation. This is estimated at 4 trillion dollars of publicly owned assets.

Het is duidelijk hieruit dat Nederland zelf maar ook een flink aantal andere landen in Europa het slachtoffer zijn en midden in dit vier stappenplan zitten.

En als je deze lijn ziet dan wordt opeens ook duidelijk waar het idee van het bizarre ESM verdrag weg komt wat niets minder is dan een financiële staatsgreep in alle Eurolanden maar vreemd genoeg al netjes ondertekend is door de Ministers van Financiën van de 17 euro-landen op 11 juli 2011.  Of het idee van de Euro-obligaties zodat banken tenminste met dit schuldpapier alle mensen van de Euro in 1 keer kunnen uitmelken via het afromen van de rente. Zo  hoef je niet langer in alle landen apart het staatspapier op te kopen, ik snap die bankiers ergens ook wel als je je leven wat makkelijker kunt maken waarom zou je die kans dan laten liggen. Het zijn allemaal tools om de macht van de internationale bankiers in Europa nog sterker te concentreren en het bestuur van Europa te de-democratiseren zodat ze nog minder last hebben van de meningen van de mensen in de Europese landen die feitelijk al onder hun regiem staan.  Jammer dat we deze 2000 jaar geschiedenis van het geldsysteem nooit in onze geschiedenisboekjes hebben gehad of er ook maar iets van horen in de mainstream media.

Maar goed, dankzij het internet is deze informatie opeens vrij toegankelijk en hierboven staan slechts enkele interessante fragmenten. Ik kan het iedereen aanraden het geheel van begin tot het einde door te lezen. The History of the “Money Changers”

Voor verdere interessante achtergrondinformatie:
-) De wereld in Gijzeling, deel 1234 en 5
-) Documentaires: The Money Masters & the Secret of Oz
-) The Power of the Purse deel 1 en deel 2 

(Dit stuk mag vrij door iedereen overgenomen worden op websites, blogs, etc. en om door te sturen aan vrienden, familie, collega`s politici, media, etc. Graag zelfs hoe meer mensen dit weten hoe beter. Zet wel even de bron erbij zodat mensen hieronder mee kunnen doen in de discussie als ze dat willen.)